Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Link Monkeys

Now we all know that there are plenty of link monkeys out there, and this is a necessary problem of SEO. We also know that many people criticise [often rightly so] the amount of people churning out hundreds of shit links month after month, but think about it for a minute ... as in the other analogy, what are the monkeys without the organ-grinders. Somebody tells them to do it, and somebody else [higher up] pays them to do it! The monkeys are just fulfilling a function in our 'industry' .... poor little lambs.

Yes I admit that many link monkeys are outsourced these days, therefore little quality control is instantly available. But again whose fault is that? Not the little monkeys, the manager or agency that made the decision, simples. Yes, lots and lots of rubbish links are handy for an SEO campaign to be successful [especially in a highly competitive market] but why do SEOs feel it above themselves to do the basics from time to time? There are too many SEOs out there who feel themselves above link building, maybe if they kept their feet on the ground they would know that [good] free links are few and far between on the interweb [no matter what that bizarre percentage Mr Cutts said a while ago was].

No, there are good links out there, but they have to be cultivated. Regular blog links are not 'dead' but they are weakened, however if a really good blog with relevant content and selective linking is applied [and the time taken to distribute & sindicate content] blogs can still be very useful. The idea that the 'anchor text is dead' is so stupid I won't even go further. That a link profile has to seem natural is beyond doubt.

These are not the traits of the average link monkey. They just do as told. Google has refined and refined its algo [how much attention do you REALLY think google pays to all those directories?]. The meta key words was too easy to key word stuff: gone. Weight of links can work if they are good, but I've seen competitors with many more links ranking nowhere. SEO, as I said takes time, forging relationships to get links from authority sources, a certain craftiness in looking for places to link well [which SEOs all missed out on the goings on in the Middle East to comment on disruption in <link>holidays in egypt</link>? ;)] on some major news websites. Oh and hey, let us not forget, fixing the site you are optimising for ... when they listen :( [precious b*****ds]

No, as much as the link monkeys get a bad press, they get it because they have bad [and lazy] SEOs and SEO Managers running poor formulaic SEO Campaigns, not thinking and not allowing their charges to think. When it comes to shit SEO and shit links: don't blame the link monkeys blame the link organ-grinders!

One last thing, if you want a good link from a good page, the first lesson should be - ask the webmaster nicely [they can only completely ignore you!]

LinkMünki

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

WhiteHats v BlackHats

Whilst not the oldest of people [and certainly not the youngest], I sometimes make references to things well beyond the ken of people outwith my era [like Bits [a TV programme google it], etcetera], and the WhiteHat v BlackHat debate always reminds me of Spy v Spy.

What I have to say here is different: there is a lot of muck slung at 'so called' Black-Hat SEOs, and for what?

Buying Links - Well what is advertising then?
Cloaking - Who actually does that?
Getting Opponents Delisted - hhrrrmmmm, well this might happen, and google seems to be making it easier.


The fact is that in my knowledge, the BlackHats are about the most honest in what they do, they come to an agreement with webmasters over a link and it is done. On the other hand we WhiteHats look everywhere for the sneakiest of links, exploiting every loophole of the rules when it comes to links, we pretend to be concerned citizens to get our sites into government & university websites. We have social bookmarking accounts that are beyond the realm of the honest people who want to keep track of their favourite websites. We write blogs which are purportedly about an issue, but are just exercises in linkbuilding.

I ask you which is the most honest, the onsite side of SEO is the both for both sides. SEO has to try to look natural, but the simple fact is that it is all bending the rules that somebody else came up with, and if you have to make something 'look natural' then it clearly is not, and if clients made really good websites with good content that people wanted to link to then it would be natural, and need very little SEO [White, Black, Grey or No Hat]

LinkMünki has Spoketh

Thursday, 23 December 2010

Festive Comments

I have just been doing comments, and the nice people over at my company's rivals Alienation Digital, were not only nice enough to publish a comment, reply, they also allowed the link to where I work Equator.



It's nice to be nice around this time of year! Even in Glasgow [Spit]

Thursday, 9 September 2010

LinkMünki on Spam

LinkMünki on Spam

It's just too easy to spam, you know it is! If it wasn't then it wouldn't be all over the net. This, to me is a problem, not that I'm really anti anything, it's just that since it is so easy just about anybody can do it, and sometimes it feels like they are. We have all logged into blogs [or our e-mails] to accept/reject these requests.

And I don't hate spam so much [I can get very close to being a spammer myself sometimes ;)], if people leave comments on my blogs and they are vaguely related to the subject, quite amusing or even if they have enough cojones I usually leave them: if they are about certain types of mucky pictures, little blue pills or really badly written they go.

But all this is by the by, in my efforts link up all of my social networking accounts [if an account gives you a public profile and you can put links on it fair enough in my opinion!] I started some of them doing what can only be described as a cacophony of autospam. It seemed like everything I did was being automagically posted on tumblr or facebook or my google profile [and my yahoo profile :)]. But they were just throwing out torrents of bit.lys, and this.lys and that.lys, and that was probably as annoying to me than to anybody who had the dipleasure to look at it. I'm shutting down the auto-spam where and when I can remember which accounts I have [but I have a lot].

But this is also a problem in spamming being made too easy, auto-posting doesn't help me get the traffic to what I want people to look at, it just clutters up the internet with rubbish that nobody wants to see. There should be controlls put on it [I can't believe I said that!!], perhaps we ought not stop it altogether but make it a lot more difficult, nothing wrong with linking profiles, but keep what you post seperate, eh! Otherwise this little interweb toy we all enjoy might meltdown and turn into mush.

LinkMünki

Friday, 3 September 2010

Blekko

The world of SEO is undergoing one of those 'things' at the moment, we have a new toy! There is a new search engine out there and it is impressing us SEO-ologists in numbers, it's called Blekko,

Wait! Wait! What the hell is this, me writing a post on something related to SEO on an SEO blog... ach I've been wittering and twittering about Blekko for a while on LinkMünki holds Court, but i need to go on more about the Blekko, so...

In the way that people think that google is 'just' a search engine, well it is, but it's rankings have been SEO-ed to ****, Blekko is so malleable, Blekko gives control to the user [you can cut spam out of your SERPS [by clicking 'spam']] Blekko gives the user so much information at the drop of a hat that sometimes it's nearly overload. I love the fact that when you check inlinks it gives you a graphic illustration of both location from where the links derive, but it also breaks it down into most popular anchors, and gives you percentages. Then if that was not good enough, when you check the list of inlinks [a bit like siteexplorer, but...] it tells you whether they are follow or nofollow, the anchor and some new info I've yet to decipher.

I know what you are all thinking, -wow-LinkMünki-this-is-fantastische- but I haven't finished yet, with a little click you can move onto a bar graph oriented multiple [between 2 and 4] website comparison [again a lot of the info I am yet to decipher, but...], bar charts rule.

For the non geek, well... for the geek too, you can create your own ways of searching [called slash tags], which is like searching for an angle on your search term, so a search might be "hotel /edinburgh" or "edinburgh /hotel" giving a different result depending on which was the more relevant to you, both giving a different result to "edinburgh hotel" or "hotel edinburgh", which you just can't do in google [plus you can add sites to the slashes, and you can create your own slashes, and make them public].

But calm down, google isn't quite dead yet, the size of the google index is ridiculous, no other search engine is likely to come close to it for well ... ages, google is still so popular and Blekko [so far] helps people look for stuff that can be so specific. But I can tell you that it is yet to be SEO-ed yet so for the moment it still gives you helpful results, not just results from companies with the best SEO's, Ima love playing with Blekko for the time being, and just pray that google doesn't get their big fat chequebook out quite yet [sorry Blekko can you wait a couple of years till you get very, very rich!]

LinkMünki @ Work

PS I'm kinda new at this stuff so don't go on at me about getting over-excited over new search engines

PPS if you want an invite you only have to ask them try here for starters, but testing will be over soon and you will all have your chance

Monday, 9 August 2010

Blekkoed

Well today I was allowed access to Blekko, I'm not sure yet what to do with it. It certainly has aspects to it which allure. But I'll tell you this: it ain't google.

As a searcher who has searched mainly by google it is weird, I liked the default slash-tags, and I liked the fact that you can create your own slash-tags. However, like all young things it has its 'teething troubles', for example I am not 100% sure how to fully utilise the slash-tags, also I am so indoctrinated into using google's site commands that I just do it naturally. There is also the question of the size of its index, it will not for a while be able to compare itself when put up next to the breadth of the google index.

This is not, however, a review, just telling you that I now have access to it, I will have to play with it for a while before I can faithfully make a judgement, but even then, it took me a while to get off Firefox and on to Chrome, now I look back at that person as rather foolish, the future is the undiscovered country.

LinkMünki away to play with Blekko

Monday, 26 July 2010

Twtkr

Yes you're not reading that incorrectly, it says twtkr not twitter. Twtkr is a very strange thing that I noticed once whilst bored and searching for traces of myself in google. It seems to be a clone of every single twitter account [don't even think about the numbers], it seems to be Korean, and unlike twitter it does 'dofollow' links.

I wondered about it for a while and then I decided I'd start to link to it from here and there, then the other day I just noticed that it is now starting to get picked up by Site Explorer, which is very interesting as this means that it must be either getting rank, or has now been fully indexed by yahoo [thus presumably bing too]. Mmmm, I don't know how much use this will turn out to be, but I'm going to keep an eye on this one.